A Strategy to Select Metallic or Semiconducting Carbon Nanotubes
from Their Mixtures
ICarbon nanotubes have played an important role in leading the nanoscience and
nanotechnology due to their peculiar one-dimensional characteristics and
potential applicabilities in various areas. One important feature is its
peculiar electronic structure that can be metallic and semiconducting depending
on the chirality and diameter of nanotubes.Up to now, it has not been possible
to control the chirality of nanotubes systematically by the conventional
synthesis approaches such as arc discharge, laser ablation, and (high-pressure)
chemical vapor deposition methods. Both metallic and semiconducting nanotubes
coexist in the grown sample, which often hinders device applications with high
performance. For instance, application to nanoscale transistors and memories
requires nanotubes to be semiconducting for clear gate modulation. Therefore,
tailoring the metallicity of nanotubes is highly desired.
One approach is to transform the electronic structures by functionalization
using gas adsorbates. We will introduce simple gases such as fluorine and
hydrogen gases to transform electronic structures from metallic to
semiconducting.[1,2]
Another approach is to select either metallic or semiconducting nanotubes from
their mixtures. Several methods of selectiing semiconducting nanotubes from
metallic ones or vice versa using dielectrophoresis, octadecylamine (ODA),
bromination, and DNA have been reported. Our aim is to select semiconducting
nanotubes from metallic ones in large quantity with high yield and more
importantly without affecting nanotube properties so that the separated
nanotubes could be used directly for various applications.
We have found a method for a selective removal of metallic single-walled carbon
nanotubes from semiconducting ones by stirring SWNT powder in tetramethylene
sulfone (TMS)/chloroform solution with nitronium hexafluoro-antimonate (NO2SbF6:
NHFA) and tetrafluoroborate (NO2BF4: NTFB). Positively charged nitronium ions
(NO2+) were intercalated into nanotube bundles, where the intercalation was
promoted also by the counter ions. Nitronium ions selectively attacked the
sidewall of the metallic SWNTs due to the abundant presence of electron density
at the Fermi level, thus yielding stronger binding energy compared to the
counterpart semiconducting SWNTs. The semiconducting SWNTs were left on the
filter after filtration, whereas the metallic SWNTs were disintegrated and
drained away as amorphous carbons. The effectiveness of selectivity was
confirmed by the resonant Raman spectra and absorption spectra.[3] Some other
ideas of removing zigzag nanotubes by carbon dioxide gas will be also
discussed.[4]
[1] K. H. An et al., Amer. Chem. Soc. 125, 3507 (2003); K. H. An et al., Appl.
Phys. Lett. 80, 4235; K. A. Park et al., Phys. Rev. B 68, 045429 (2003).
[2] K. S. Kim et al. Adv. Mat. 14, 181 (2002); K. A. Park et al., . Phys. Chem.B,
to be published.
[3] K. H. An et al. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 127, 5196 (2005).
[4] K. Y. Seo et al., J. Amer. Chem. Soc. Comm. 125, 13946 (2003).
This document at the URL
;
http://www.fy.chalmers.se/conferences/nt05/abstracts/I11.html; has been
visited 2747 times since April 2005.
Last update: April 2005;